The LA Times has reported that actress and former anti-Vietnam war activist Jane Fonda has endorsed Barack Obama.
This endorsement is not surprising in itself, nor is it the first time a liberal like Fonda has given their nod to Obama.Â However, some people, such as Michael van der Galien over at Poligazette, have a warning for Obama:
My advise for Obama, then: donâ€™t appear publicly with Fonda. It can only hurt you; youâ€™ve already got the support of the far-left of the Democratic Party, you donâ€™t need her to in order to get the radicals to support you.
Though I don’t think that Fonda can really harm Obama that much (he weathered the Wright affair), I am inclined to agree with this statement.Â We’re on the final leg of the primaries, and while Obama still needs all the liberals he can get to the win the nomination, that will soon change.
Assuming he becomes the nominee, appearing with Fonda may become a bad idea.Â This is because he’ll need to start reaching out to moderates and conservatives if he wishes to become President.Â Now, I can’t speak for everybody, but I’m willing to bet the old stigma Fonda has for appearing in those photos with the Vietcong still exists for perhaps all but the most liberal of people in this country.Â That’s an association Obama really doesn’t need, given his already vocal denunciation of the Iraq war.
Lets face the facts.Â The conservatives will start sending out their troops again if Obama does appear with Fonda, just as the liberals did with John McCain and John Hagee.Â I don’t agree with the tactics employed by either side, but it is what happens.
Obama came through Wrightgate with some scratches, but also with some newfound respect by supporters and opponents alike.Â Could he survive yet another pounding by the media and blogosphere?Â Probably.Â But why incur such wrath if you don’t need to?
My advice therefore remains largely the same.Â Quietly accept the endorsement,Â but stay away from Jane Fonda.