I figured the time was ripe to say it again. Biden. Palin. Medical records please.
About a week ago, I wrote an entry warning the two major candidates to not become cocky (in Barack Obama’s case), depressed (in John McCain’s case), or downright complacent, given the “inevitability” of an Obama win. Now obviously, I didn’t actually think this was going to happen, but Barack Obama said something the other day that shows he recognizes the danger, and will do his best to not let it get to him.
Here’s what he said, as noted by Chicago Sun-Times writer Lynn Sweet:
“Don’t underestimate the capacity of Democrats to snatch defeat from
the jaws of victory,” Mr. Obama said. “Don’t underestimate our ability
to screw it up.”
The idea of snatching defeat from the jaws of victory has a long history with the Democrats. It happened to John Kerry in 2004. Obama doesn’t want it to happen to him.
Basically, I think this debate was not much different than the last two. There were some good points brought up by both sides, however. John McCain did better in this debate that the last two, and made a good attempt at defining his economic stances, and calling on Obama to explain his connections. Obama, meanwhile, remained the cool candidate he’s portrayed himself as in the previous debates, by not letting things get to him.
It’s amazing how things can change in a matter of hours, isn’t it? Mere hours ago, I was pondering my options for the future, given John McCain and Barack Obama’s contempt for their critics.
Yesterday, Sarah Palin brought up the Obama-William Ayers connection , saying Obama was “palling around with terrorists.” Then hours ago, Politico had a report about Obama’s return volley in the form of the Keating 5 scandal, which McCain was embroiled in some years ago. Our own Michael ver der Galien discussed this development in another article.
Both are misleading at best. But both are the types of things I thought I’d never see from both campaigns. And thus, my support for them is lost. On November 4th, my vote goes to Libertarian Party candidate Bob Barr.
The crew at Saturday Night Live has, I think, outdone themselves again. If the Palin/Clinton speech and Couric interview skits were comedy gold, their take on the VP debate went to a whole new level. They parodied both Biden and Palin mercilessly.
If you’ve noticed in my past couple posts, I’ve skewered both John McCain and Barack Obama. I will continue doing so until the election. Both have much to account for and each day that goes by makes my choice to vote for Bob Barr much easier.
The gloves are off.
There’s been much hoopla around the blogosphere in recent days about Barack Obama’s questionable associations with domestic terrorist William Ayers. Seems that there is bad judgment there at best.
But what about Sarah Palin’s associations with the Alaska Independence Party? Is her various levels of association with them not just as bad judgment?
(Cross-posted from Poligazette)
Earlier, our own Michael van der Galien wrote about the switch in the McCain campaign to attacks on Barack Obama’s character, judgement, and associations. In particular, he discussed Sarah Palin’s questioning of Obama’s past associations with domestic terrorist William Ayers.
I seriously hope that ‘questions’ are not all the McCain campaign has. How many staff members do they have on their campaign? Surely there are people looking for any and all facts with which to destroy Obama? And if there is something, I would think that releasing it sooner rather than later would be the proper thing to do.